Researchers describe a new test that is nearly as good as the standard
protocol but much less invasive for identifying children with urinary tract
infections who are at risk of developing kidney scars.
by John
Tyburski
Copyright © Daily
Digest News, KPR Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Urinary
tract infections (UTIs) are the most common serious bacterial illnesses affecting
young children. Nearly one in eight children with UTIs will develop permanent
scarring in the kidneys. Worse, scarring is associated with a higher risk of
kidney failure later in life. Unfortunately, the standard method of determining
which children with UTIs that are at risk for renal or kidney scarring is quite
invasive and delivers a considerable dose of ionizing radiation.
Researchers
reported on Tuesday a set of criteria that are minimally
invasive yet perform nearly as well as the standard method of assessing
childhood UTIs and renal scarring risk. The criteria are high fever, detection
of kidney abnormalities with ultrasound imaging, and detection of a non E.
coli bacterial infection. Early detection of children who may develop
scarring is crucial, and using the three criteria as a screening test will also
allow doctors to set aside those children who will likely not develop scarring
and avoid unnecessary procedures.
In the
past, doctors used a catheter to deliver dye in the urinary system and then had
the children urinate while undergoing X-ray imaging to detect alterations in
the way the kidneys drained. The test causes considerable discomfort, delivers
non-trivial amounts of radiation exposure, and is particularly unsettling to
children.
Nader
Shaikh and colleagues at the University of Pittsburg reviewed previously
published studies involving 1,280 children and found the three criteria were
most strongly associated with scarring. They constructed a predictive model and
were able to positively identify 45 percent of the children that developed
scarring. The test was even better at identifying those children who would not
develop scarring, marking 80 percent of the low-risk group.
“The
prediction is not perfect,” he said. “For more or less, we can say these 80
percent of kids aren’t going to scar, we don’t have to worry about them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment