Researchers assess evidence indicating that 1934 was a serious drought
year for North America, the worst in the past 1,000 years.
by John
Tyburski
Copyright © Daily
Digest News, KPR Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
The Dust
Bowl drought of the 1930s caused catastrophic farm and livestock failure
throughout the central United States. New research reveals that it was not just
the worst dry spell in memory — it was the worst in North America in the past
millennium.
The
drought of 1934 was so-named for the dust from the Midwest that was blown by
winds to as far east as North Carolina and Florida.
“Not only
did 1934 [the first year of the Dust Bowl] stand out in terms of extent and
intensity, but it was the worst by a fair margin,” says Benjamin Cook, a
climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York
and a co-author of the study.
Cook and
his coworkers referenced the North American Drought Atlas, a record derived
from tree-ring chronologies that reconstructs precipitation and drought
patterns for the past 2,005 years. They discovered that the 1934 drought
affected over 70 percent of western North America and was 30 percent worse than
the number two drought in the region over the study period, which occurred in
1580.
Earlier
work by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center scientists linked the Dust Bowl’s
cause to sea-surface temperatures that were a bit cooler in the Pacific
compared to the surface temperatures in the Atlantic. Cook and colleagues
conclude that these temperatures likely played only a minor role. They say that
a high-pressure ridge centered over the North American west coast blocked wet
weather from moving eastward during the autumn and winter of 1933–1934.
The report
and proposed cause is apropos to the current drought in California, where a
similar atmospheric pattern was observed last winter. Cook and his team found
that similar high-pressure ridges preceded some of the worst dry spells on the
west coast, including the worst California drought in history, the two-year
1976 drought.
The
manuscript was published in
the most recent issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
No comments:
Post a Comment