When mutated, a gene important in cell fate
is dialed down to be less active, a change that has the downstream effect of
lower pigment levels in the blonde hair found in northern Europeans.
by John
Tyburski
Copyright © Daily
Digest News, KPR Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
While hair
color is among the most outwardly varying traits, the underlying genetic
mechanisms that determine it have been poorly understood. Even with new,
data-rich, and far-reaching approaches such as the genome-wide association
study, or GWAS, that have pointed to several spots on the human genome involved
in pigmentation, how variation in these genetic regions connects with different
hair color has until now been a complete mystery. However, a team of Stanford
University researchers cracked the code for blonde hair color, and their
findings were published this
week in the journal Nature Genetics.
The
groundbreaking work under senior author David Kingsley’s direction is important
because in addition to discovering what makes a person have blonde hair, the
discovery illustrates the importance of regulatory segments of the genetic code
in how an organism looks. Changes, or mutations in genes have been known to
cause changes in appearance, but this discovery involves a change in a DNA
“switch” for a gene and not the gene itself.
The genetic
determinants of hair color have been a research topic for geneticists for
a long time, but answers have been slow in coming. Recent GWAS studies have
identified about eight chromosomal regions associated with blonde hair color.
These studies found certain single-nuleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, were more
common in fair-haired individuals. However, causal links have to date not yet
been established.
Kingsley and
colleagues had for years studied a gene called KITLG in
stickleback fish. Changes in the regulation of this gene led to changes in the
fish skin color. The regulatory change was caused by a SNP in the regulatory
DNA for KITLG. The researchers decided to examine KITLG regulation
in mice and found that making changes to the regulatory DNA for this gene in
mice caused the coat to be much lighter and in some cases, even white.
The
researchers then engineered mice with two versions of human KITLG,
one with the blonde-producing SNP and the other version that produces darker
hair. The mice with the blonde-producing SNP were lighter. Interestingly, KITLG is
not a gene for pigmentation but for determining cell fate in developing organisms.
The blonde-producing SNP causes the transcription of the gene to drop by about
20 percent.
“This isn’t
a ‘turn the switch off,’ ” Kingsley says. “It’s a ‘turn the switch down.’ ”
The
etymology and spelling of the words blond and blonde form an interesting side
note. The adjective “blond” has predominantly been used for males, whereas
“blonde” is most often used for females.
No comments:
Post a Comment